Incoprea Theory
Volume IX · 44

Theory 11/Physics, Cosmos & Matter /Nanoscale optics

Blinking Is a Percolation

Blinking is modelled as one trap capturing one carrier. The environment may decide whether traps connect.

The claim

Quantum dot blinking is set by percolation of charge traps around the dot rather than by single-trap events, so blinking statistics should change with trap density in a threshold manner.

01The evidence

Blinking statistics follow power laws that vary between dots and between environments, which is consistent with a collective process.

02The tension

Single-trap models predict exponential distributions. The observed power laws require distributions of traps, which are usually fitted rather than explained.

03The mechanism

A dot is surrounded by traps in a matrix. If traps percolate to the dot, charge can be exchanged continuously; if not, the dot is isolated and dark periods are rare.

That makes trap connectivity the control, and predicts a threshold in trap density below which blinking statistics change character.

04What this is not

Single-trap models

Those models assume independent traps. This assumes connectivity, which predicts a threshold.

05Predictions

  • P1Blinking should change character at a trap density threshold.
  • P2Statistics should track connectivity.
  • P3Matrix engineering should suppress blinking.

06Refutation

Blinking statistics independent of trap density would favour single-trap models.

07What it changes

It would change how blinking is suppressed in displays.