04-water-retention
Supplied working report; original verdicts not validated.
Review status: Needs review. This is an archival source note, not a passed proof.
README.md
# 04-water-retention **Claim.** Soil water retention is set by the ratio of grain size to **Verdict: Supported** porosity alone R2=0.212; texture adds dR2=0.375; median within-bin p90/p10 of theta33 = 2.5x. Files: `hypothesis.md` (posted claim + contract), `run.py` (reproducible), `results.json` (numbers), `figures/` (plots).
hypothesis.md
# Hypothesis 04 — Water Retention Follows Grain Size **Source.** Incoprea Research hypothesis notebook, `frontier-theories-16 #37` (identifier H291). Reproduced from the posted entry. **Claim.** Soil water retention is set by the ratio of grain size to pore-throat size rather than by total porosity, so two soils with equal porosity can hold very different amounts of water. **Proposed mechanism.** Retention is governed by the pore-size distribution rather than by total pore volume; texture sets the pore-throat sizes. **Predictions.** - P1 — Texture terms add a large R² gain over porosity alone. - P2 — Within equal-porosity bins, retained water varies several-fold (2–5×), so porosity alone badly mispredicts retention. **Refutation condition.** Porosity alone explains most of the variance (R² > 0.8) and equal-porosity soils differ by less than ~1.3×. ## Test contract (pre-specified) Data: USDA KSSL `lab_physical_properties` (Soil Data Access REST), 100,000 lab horizons with measured θ at −33 kPa. - Outcome: `water_retention_third_bar` (θ33, % vol), `water_retention_15_bar` (θ1500, % vol). - Porosity: `1 − bulk_density_oven_dry / particle_density` (particle density from `particle_density_less_than_2mm` when present, else 2.65 g/cm³). The directly measured `water_retention_0_bar_sieve` is 99.9 % missing, so porosity is computed from bulk density — this deviation from the original note is flagged. - Texture: clay, silt, and the sand sub-fractions (fine, very fine, medium, coarse, very coarse). - Regress θ33 on porosity alone vs porosity + texture; report R² gain and AIC. - Within 0.02-wide porosity bins, report the p90/p10 ratio of θ33 and θ1500. **Support if** texture adds a large R² gain and equal-porosity bins show 2–5× spread. **Refute if** porosity alone reaches R² > 0.8 and bins differ < 1.3×.