{
  "title": "Current investigation status",
  "as_of": "2026-11-01",
  "scope_notice": "Editorial assessment of retained reports, not a new experiment, full reproduction, peer review or novelty certification. All original hypotheses, negative results and revisions remain archived.",
  "investigations": [
    {
      "id": "storage-chronology",
      "title": "Energy-storage chronology",
      "current_assessment": "Worth continuing: the reported effect is strongly dependent on which weather persistence the comparison preserves.",
      "evidence_scope": "Supplied analysis of RTE observations with ideal-store and stylised fleet models. The smaller system-objective ratio is dominated by unserved-energy penalties, not demonstrated capital savings.",
      "reproduction_status": "Source-reported computations and derivations; not independently reproduced during publication or this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "Validate time handling and optimization independently; test whether exceptional-year residuals survive stronger persistence-preserving controls.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/further-20261101/01-storage-chronology/report.html",
      "reader_url": "storage-chronology.html"
    },
    {
      "id": "H0199",
      "title": "H0199 \u00b7 Reference-witness placement",
      "current_assessment": "A useful conditional design result with a clear physical comparison; numerical prose contains unresolved inconsistencies.",
      "evidence_scope": "Synthetic spatial fields and a boundary-identifiability argument. No deposition experiment; witness interference and variable capture efficiency are not resolved.",
      "reproduction_status": "Source-reported computations and derivations; not independently reproduced during publication or this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "Reconcile contradictory report sentences with retained outputs, then compare equal-count/equal-area layouts against an independent full-field map.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/further-20261101/04-H0199-reference-placement/report.html",
      "reader_url": "h0199.html"
    },
    {
      "id": "N0751",
      "title": "N0751 \u00b7 Differential swelling sensor",
      "current_assessment": "A well-specified instrument hypothesis with a strong matched-time control; predicted performance remains unmeasured.",
      "evidence_scope": "Analytical two-path, first-order response plus simulations with assumed diffusion and readout noise. No device measurements.",
      "reproduction_status": "Source-reported computations and derivations; not independently reproduced during publication or this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "Measure each pathway\u2019s gain, response time and noise; freeze parameters before unseen-waveform and matched-time-control comparisons.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/further-20261101/03-N0751-swelling-sensor/report.html",
      "reader_url": "n0751.html"
    },
    {
      "id": "E4-H160",
      "title": "E4-H160 \u00b7 Single-target delay precision",
      "current_assessment": "A bounded mathematical correction with a separately implemented local statistical check; not evidence of a new physical resolution limit.",
      "evidence_scope": "Corrected complex-noise Fisher information and known-versus-nuisance phase models; independent seeded local high-SNR Monte Carlo. No physical data, global acquisition test or multi-target validation.",
      "reproduction_status": "Earlier publisher correction records an independently authored local simulation and arithmetic recalculation. It did not reproduce the supplied FFT estimator or physical experiment; no rerun in this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "Keep corrected tables and assumptions adjacent to the original report; broader ranging claims require a model of multiple targets, nuisance parameters and acquisition failures.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/nov1-corrections-20261101/checks/h160/REPORT.md",
      "reader_url": "e4-h160.html"
    },
    {
      "id": "E4-H034",
      "title": "E4-H034 \u00b7 Elastic dipoles and MLIP error",
      "current_assessment": "The original missing-far-field-energy explanation is unsupported; reference-assisted error prediction remains an open lead.",
      "evidence_scope": "Supplied lattice-model comparisons, not DFT or MLIP validation on real defects. The required dipole reference is not a free runtime feature.",
      "reproduction_status": "Source-reported computations and derivations; not independently reproduced during publication or this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "Repair the pilot split: defect-family/configuration groups can test one material; held-out-material claims require multiple materials.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/further-20261101/02-H034-materials-error/report.html",
      "reader_url": "e4-h034.html"
    },
    {
      "id": "13-magnetic-warning",
      "title": "#13 \u00b7 Magnetic battery warning",
      "current_assessment": "Magnetic detectability is worth a controlled apparatus check; battery warning time is not established.",
      "evidence_scope": "Field calculations and idealized background rejection. Return geometry, growth rate, failure threshold and false-alarm behavior remain assumed or unmeasured.",
      "reproduction_status": "Source-reported computations and derivations; not independently reproduced during publication or this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "A wire phantom may establish signal/background discrimination only; real fault-labelled battery measurements would be needed to assess warning time.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/further-20261101/05-13-magnetic-warning/report.html",
      "reader_url": "13-magnetic-warning.html"
    },
    {
      "id": "H0346",
      "title": "H0346 \u00b7 Perforated hydrogel skin",
      "current_assessment": "A useful negative result within the stated diffusion model; retain it beside the original favorable claim.",
      "evidence_scope": "Supplied simulations do not support the proposed gain over the area-only control. Constant-diffusion and idealized geometry assumptions exclude some real-gel mechanisms.",
      "reproduction_status": "Source-reported computations and derivations; not independently reproduced during publication or this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "State the conditional refutation prominently; an independently controlled diffusion measurement could determine whether model assumptions describe a real sample.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/further-20261101/06-H0346-hydrogel-skin/report.html",
      "reader_url": "h0346.html"
    },
    {
      "id": "15-sodium-pulse",
      "title": "#15 \u00b7 Sodium-ion pulse charging",
      "current_assessment": "The original universal penalty framing is replaced by a mechanism-dependent comparison.",
      "evidence_scope": "Conditional charge-transfer mathematics and an uncalibrated lumped-cell model. No cell measurements; the proposed frequency window is parameter-dependent.",
      "reproduction_status": "Source-reported computations and derivations; not independently reproduced during publication or this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "Specify matched charge throughput and temperature controls before testing plating onset; do not present the model window as a measured cell property.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/further-20261101/07-15-sodium-pulse/report.html",
      "reader_url": "15-sodium-pulse.html"
    },
    {
      "id": "24-tactile-standard",
      "title": "#24 \u00b7 Tactile-force calibration",
      "current_assessment": "A useful uncertainty-budget proposal; precision and standards compliance remain unvalidated.",
      "evidence_scope": "Calculated budgets use assumed hysteresis, creep, geometry and material properties. No measured phantom or sensor calibration; standards were not fully assessed.",
      "reproduction_status": "Source-reported computations and derivations; not independently reproduced during publication or this editorial review.",
      "next_milestone": "Measure one sensor\u2019s history-dependent response and characterize the reference material before claiming an achieved uncertainty or certified standard.",
      "latest_report_url": "https://incoprea.com/research-library/further-20261101/08-24-tactile-standard/report.html",
      "reader_url": "24-tactile-standard.html"
    }
  ],
  "editorial_errata": [
    {
      "id": "H0199",
      "status": "Unresolved numerical narration; originals preserved.",
      "note": "The supplied report states that 1.6% RMSE beats 0.77%, with additional incompatible figures in the same sentence. Its closing pure-linear-gradient tie statement also conflicts with its earlier table. No replacement values are asserted here; reconcile against retained outputs before repeating these comparisons.",
      "source_path": "work/research-packages/further-20261101/04-H0199-reference-placement/REPORT.md",
      "source_lines": [
        40,
        47,
        94,
        96,
        115,
        118
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "E4-H034",
      "status": "Unresolved pilot-design contradiction; originals preserved.",
      "note": "The proposed single-material pilot cannot provide a material-grouped validation split. Use appropriate within-material groups and limit the claim, or assemble multiple materials before assessing held-out-material generalization.",
      "source_path": "work/research-packages/further-20261101/02-H034-materials-error/REPORT.md",
      "source_lines": [
        111,
        121
      ]
    }
  ],
  "omitted_from_this_status_panel": "Weathering coupons are retained elsewhere; this editorial pass did not substantiate a newer completed result for that direction.",
  "policy": "Curation changes prominence, not preservation. Predictions, negative findings and model limits remain accessible. No Blogger or Reddit promotion is implied by inclusion."
}