Incoprea research · batch 1 · 3 November 2026

Batch 1: five pages

What this batch is. A set of computational and re-analytical investigations into how measurement claims fail: reference-dependent quantities, model-freedom-driven reversals, and dimensionless laws used as explanations. Two pages use real published or catalogue data. No new physical experiment was performed.

Read in this order

Page	Subject	Headline result
1	Dimensionless laws, spreads, and theory	Eight groups audited; spread at fixed value 0.09×–125.9×; no group sufficient
2	Reversals, model freedom, constraint protocol	0% apparent reversals at 2 free coefficients, 24% at 4; parity theorem proved, 0 violations in 3,000 trials, two-crossing conjecture refuted
3	Re-scoring the record; real-data replication	I2 spans 75.8×; H203 objection replicates at 0.0064 dex; its tail index does not reproduce
4	116 hypotheses, ten domains	67 testable now, 47 noted, 2 closed
5	Index, status, batch 2, and designs	Full status table; estimator spread 2.4×; parity theorem; three two-switch membrane designs; 148 further hypotheses

What is real here

Real data: the CNEOS fireball catalogue (602 events, fetched 2026-11-03) and the numbers quoted from the hub's own I2 and H0199 records.
Real computation: every other number on these pages is produced by the accompanying scripts, seeded and re-runnable.
Real negatives: four items are refuted or fail, including two of my own prior expectations.

What is not

No experiment, no measurement of a physical quantity.
No novelty claim; no systematic literature search.
No proof of the crossing bound — it is a conjecture with evidence.

Incoprea Research · batch 1 · 3 November 2026.