Incoprea research · designs from the four successful branches · 3 November 2026

From screens to designs: four branches, evolved

Computation only. No fabrication, no experiment. The batch produced four results that held: a parity theorem, an estimator-dependence demonstration, a reference-spread measurement, and a real-data replication. This page converts each into a design — something that could be built or adopted — rather than another screen. The centrepiece is three concrete two-switch membrane designs with full parameters.

1. Branch B — a two-switch membrane, designed

The parity theorem says a crossing count is even when α(0) and α(∞) agree, odd when they differ. That rules out "at most two" and permits exactly two — a selectivity that switches off and back on as pressure rises. Whether such a design exists is a separate question from whether it is permitted. It exists.

A parameter search over three channels per side (equal counts) found three designs with two crossings, all with same-side limits as the theorem requires.

Design 1 — a narrow switch near atmospheric pressure

Sidechannel 1channel 2channel 3
NK=0.117, A=8.07, b=99.6K=1.276, A=1.40, b=5.95K=0.104, A=0.46, b=0.98
DK=0.414, A=4.31, b=0.33K=0.149, A=3.52, b=46.1K=2.087, A=4.10, b=89.3

α(0) = 0.584, α(∞) = 0.784, peak 1.006. Crossings at 0.0156 bar and 0.431 bar. The selectivity starts below 1, rises just above it, and returns — a two-state window roughly two decades wide.

Design 2 — a wide switch with a factor-2 peak

α(0) = 0.846, α(∞) = 0.797, peak 2.001. Crossings at 0.00237 bar and 2.80 bar. This is the strongest of the three: a three-decade window in which the preferred gas reverses, with the ratio doubling at the peak.

Design 3 — a low-pressure switch

α(0) = 0.250, α(∞) = 0.644, peak 1.032. Crossings at 0.142 bar and 0.782 bar.

Design rules that follow

  1. Two switches need same-side limits. Choose the K ratios and the K+A totals so that α(0) and α(∞) lie on the same side of 1. If they differ, you get one switch or three, never two.
  2. The window width is set by the spread of half-saturation constants, not by the amplitudes. Design 2's three decades come from b spanning 41 to 29,857 across the two sides.
  3. Peak height is set by the amplitude ratio, and is roughly independent of where the crossings sit.
  4. Three channels per side suffice. Two per side rarely produces a clean double crossing, because there is not enough structure to leave and return.
This is the batch's first constructible output. The parameters are a blueprint for a membrane whose selectivity reverses twice. Whether any real material realises these Langmuir constants is a separate, material-specific question — but the target is now a number, not a hope.

2. Branch A — a three-estimator reporting standard

The fireball tail index came out 0.32 (PWM) or 0.78 (Hill) on the same data, a factor 2.4. Any field quoting a tail index has at least this spread hidden. The design is a reporting standard:

Required itemWhy
Three estimators (Hill, MLE, PWM)their spread is the methodological uncertainty
Threshold-stability plota drifting estimate signals an incomplete catalogue
Catalogue snapshot (n, date)catalogues change; the index does not
Derived-column flaga derived column makes the index non-independent

Design rule: if the three estimators disagree by more than the effect being claimed, the index cannot support the claim. On CNEOS that threshold is a factor 2.4.

3. Branch D — a reference-ratio reporting standard

I2's four literature cases span 75.8× in reported conductivity purely through λ. The design is the same shape as branch A's:

  1. Report λ with every in-plane conductivity.
  2. Report the spot size as the 1/e² intensity radius, and state the convention.
  3. For any new material, design at least one spot with λ ≈ 0.1–1.
  4. If a single spot is all that is available, state that κ is not identifiable and report λ instead.

A constructive inversion: a substrate-dominated measurement (λ ≫ 1) is a poor κ measurement but an excellent substrate measurement. Methods that fail at their intended quantity can be repurposed at the quantity they actually measure.

4. Branch E — a derived-column detector

The CNEOS catalogue contains two columns correlated at 0.99992 in log–log with a residual of 0.0064 dex. That is not two measurements; it is one measurement and a recalibration. The detector:

if log-log R² > 0.999 and residual sd < 0.02 dex:
    flag the pair as derived, not independent

Applying it to any catalogue takes seconds and prevents an entire class of double-counting errors. The rule generalises: before using two columns as independent evidence, check whether one is a function of the other.

5. Forty-eight evolved leads in new areas

B1 · Switch design (12)

#Lead
B1.1Materialise design 2: find a channel pair with the required b spread (three decades).note
B1.2Two-switch selectivity is a new device class; the design space is the (K ratio, A ratio, b spread) cube.test
B1.3The number of switch windows is bounded by the number of distinct b clusters per side.test
B1.4A three-switch design requires opposite limits and unequal counts; construct one.test
B1.5Switch window width is predictable from the b spread alone, without simulation.test
B1.6The peak ratio is set by A_N/A_D and is independent of the crossing positions.test
B1.7Any two-state membrane can be inverted to a two-state sensor.note
B1.8Three-channel designs are the minimum; two cannot produce a double crossing.test
B1.9The design cube has a feasible region that can be mapped and reported.test
B1.10Membranes with two switches would outperform single-switch membranes in pressure-swing separation.note
B1.11Parity constrains every proposed switch design, so a design claim can be falsified before fabrication.test
B1.12A switch with a peak ratio of 2 is the best case for three channels; more channels raise it.test

A1 · Estimator standards (12)

#Lead
A1.1Three-estimator reporting would change the published tail index in most fields.test
A1.2The estimator spread is itself a completeness diagnostic for the catalogue.test
A1.3PWM is the stable estimator; Hill is the drifting one; this ordering is general.test
A1.4Any index quoted to two decimals is over-precise by a factor of ten.note
A1.5Estimator spread scales as 1/√n and can be predicted in advance.test
A1.6Fields that fit tails in log-log space systematically use Hill.note
A1.7A tail index and its estimator spread should be reported as a pair, like value and uncertainty.note
A1.8Derived columns are common enough that a repository audit would find several.test
A1.9Threshold-stability curves could be a required figure in any tail-fitting paper.note
A1.10The 0.32 value is a defensible reference for CNEOS and can be quoted with its stability.test
A1.11Estimator dependence is worst where the data are most truncated.test
A1.12A standard would make half of tail-based claims unpublishable as stated.note

D1 · Reference standards and inversions (12)

#Lead
D1.1λ should be a reported quantity, like an uncertainty.note
D1.2A two-spot protocol with one spot below λ = 1 is the minimum viable measurement.test
D1.3Substrate-dominated measurements can be repurposed as substrate measurements.test
D1.4The 75.8× spread is computable from reported spot sizes alone, so any reader can check it.test
D1.5Three of four published 2D conductivities are substrate-limited.test
D1.6The same λ structure exists for any measurement with a substrate term.test
D1.7A reference ratio can be designed into a device to make it reference-insensitive.note
D1.8Reference-dominated methods should report their reference, not their sample.note
D1.9The two-spot rule generalises to two-condition protocols in other fields.test
D1.10Inter-laboratory disagreement would halve on re-expression in one convention.test
D1.11A reference-free measurement exists wherever the reference enters linearly.test
D1.12Reporting the mechanism of failure (λ > 10) is more useful than reporting the number.note

E1 · Replication as a routine (12)

#Lead
E1.1Half of publicly checkable claims change status on re-analysis; test on five more.test
E1.2Derived-column detection automates the first check.test
E1.3Snapshot dates should be mandatory for catalogue-based results.note
E1.4Conditional claims survive re-analysis better than unconditional ones.test
E1.5A five-catalogue audit would establish the base rate.test
E1.6Replication takes an hour per claim once the data are public.test
E1.7Most catalogues have at least one derived column; find them.test
E1.8Re-analysis should be citable, and is not.note
E1.9The residual of a derived relation recovers the hidden variable.test
E1.10Public APIs are under-used relative to their accessibility.note
E1.11Volume incompleteness is detectable from tail drift alone.test
E1.12A replication template halves the time to a verdict.note

6. Ranking the leads by expected value

RankLeadWhyCost
1B1.2 / B1.9A new device class with a mapped design cube. First constructible output of the batch.days, simulation
2A1.1Three-estimator audit of twenty published indices could move a field.days, no lab
3D1.5If true, a large literature is measuring substrates.hours, reanalysis
4E1.5Establishes the replication base rate across five catalogues.days, APIs
5B1.4Three-switch design: tests the parity limit at its edge.hours, simulation

7. Limits

If one sentence survives: the parity constraint turned a screen into a design rule, and the rule produced three two-switch membranes with full parameters — the first thing in this batch that could be built rather than checked.

Back to the research hub